The Influence of Ultrafine Filler Materials on Mechanical and Durability Characteristics of Concrete

Document Type : Research Papers


1 Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Graduate University of Advanced Technology

2 Professor, Concrete Technology and Durability Research Center, Amirkabir University of Technology.

3 Department of Civil Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology

4 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran


This paper aims at investigating the influence of partial replacement of Portland cement with ultrafine fillers compared to limestone powder on the durability and mechanical characteristics of concrete. For this purpose, ultrafine calcium carbonate materials with different specific surface areas of 9.7 and 15.1 m2/g and limestone powder (0.72 m2/g) were used. The results indicate that the ultrafine fillers enhanced the durability properties compared to the mixtures containing limestone. For instance, ultrafine fillers provided up to 20% higher concrete surface resistivity and 20% lower rapid chloride migration test (RCMT) coefficient, while limestone mixes showed equal or even lower durability levels compared to the plain mixture with 0% supplementary cementitious materials. The influence of filler materials on the compressive strength was not significant. However, regardless of the surface area, incorporating filler materials at levels up to 5% led to somewhat higher compressive strengths compared to the plain mixture. Generally, it seems that using finer fillers may lead to more durable concrete mixes.


Main Subjects

AASHTO TP 95-11. (2011). “Surface resistivity indication of concrete’s ability to resist chloride ion penetration”, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Washington, DC.
ACI Committee 234. (2006). ACI 234-06: Guide for the use of silica fume in concrete, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI.
ASTM C642. (1997). “Standard test method for density, absorption and voids in hardened concrete”, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 04(02), West Conshohocken, PA.
Bederina, M., Makhloufi, Z., and Bouzuiani, T. (2011). “Effect of limestone fillers on the physic-mechanical properties of limestone concrete”, Physics Procedia, 21, 28-34.
Camiletti, J., Soliman, A.M. and Nehdi, M.L. (2013). “Effects of nano-and micro-limestone addition on early age properties of ultra – high performance concrete”, Materials and Structures, 46(6), 881-898.
Celik, K., Jackson, M.D., Mancio, M., Meral, C., Emwas, A.H., Mehta, P.K., and Monteiro, P.J.M. (2014). “High-volume natural volcanic pozzolan and limestone powder as partial replacement for Portland cement in self-compacting and sustainable concrete”, Cement and Concrete Composites, 45(1), 136-147.
Dadash, P. and Ramezanianpour, A.A. (2014). “Hybrid Fiber Reinforced Concrete Containing Pumice and Metakaolin”, Civil Engineering Infrastructures Journal, 47(2), 229-238.
De Larrard, F. (1999). Concrete mixture proportioning, A scientific approach, E and FN Spon, London.
Dyer, T. (2014). Concrete durability, CRC Press, Boca Raton.
EN 197-1. (2000). “Cement – Part 1. Composition, specifications and uniformity criteria for common cements”, European Committee for Standardization.
Gjorv, O.D. (2014). Durability design of concrete structures in severe environment, Taylor & Francis, New York.
Kawashima, S., Hou, P., Corr, D. and Shah, S. (2013). “Modification of cement-based materials with nanoparticles”, Cement and Concrete Composites, 36(2), 8-15.
Lawrence, P., Cyr, M. and Ringot, E. (2005). “Mineral admixtures in mortars. Effect of type, amount and fineness of fine constituents on compressive strength”, Cement and Concrete Research, 35(6), 1092-1105.
Madani, H., Bagheri, A. and Parhizkar, T. (2012). “The pozzolanic reactivity of monodispersed Nano silica - hydrosols and their influence on the hydration characteristics of Portland cement”, Cement and concrete research, 42, 1563-1570.
Madani, H., Bagheri, A. and Parhizkar, T. (2014). “The electrical resistivity and chloride resistance of concretes containing the Nano silica hydrosols”, Cement and Concrete Composites, 53, 18-24.
Meddah, M.S., Lambachiya, M. and Dhir, K. (2014). “Potential use of binary and composite limestone cements in concrete production”, Construction and Building Materials, 58(5), 193-205.
NT BUILD 492. (1999). Concrete, mortar and cement-based repair materials: chloride migration coefficient from non-steady-state migration experiments, Nordtest Publication, Espoo, Finland.
Qian, K., Tao, M., Xiao-Qian, Q. and Shu-Lin, Z. (2009). “Research on some properties of fly ash concrete with nano-CaCO3 middle slurry”, Key Engineering Materials, 405, 186-190.
Ramezanianpour, A.A. (2013). Cement replacement materials: properties, durability, sustainability, Springer London Limited, London.
Ramezanianpour, A.A., Ghiasvand, E., Nickseresht, I., Mahdikhani, M. and Moodi, F. (2009). “Influence of various amounts of limestone powder on performance of Portland limestone cement concretes”, Cement and Concrete Composites, 31(10), 715-720.
Tarighat A. and Jalaifar, F. (2014). “Assessing the performance of corroding RC bridge decks: A critical review of corrosion propagation models”, Civil Engineering Infrastructures Journal, 47(2), 173-186.
Tsivilis, S., Chaniotakis, E., Kakali, G. and Batis, G. (2002). “An analysis of the properties of portland limestone cements and concrete”, Cement and Concrete Composites, 24(3), 371-8.
Vuk, T., Tinta, V., Gabrovslek, R. and Kauclicl, V. (2001). “The effects of limestone addition, clinker type and fineness on properties of Portland”, Cement and Concrete Research, 31(1), 135-139.
Volume 49, Issue 2
December 2016
Pages 251-262
  • Receive Date: 19 December 2015
  • Revise Date: 23 September 2016
  • Accept Date: 04 October 2016
  • First Publish Date: 01 December 2016