Assessment of Near-Fault Ground Motion Effects on the Fragility Curves of Tall Steel Moment Resisting Frames

Document Type: Research Papers


1 Dept. of Civil Eng., Faculty of Engineering, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran

2 Dept. of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran



Nowadays it is common to use the fragility curves in probabilistic methods to determine the collapse probability resulting from an earthquake. The uncertainties exist in intensity and frequency content of the earthquake records are considered as the most effective parameters in developing the fragility curves. The pulse-type records reported in the near-fault regions might lead to the major damages in the structures having moderate and long periods since response spectra of near-fault ground motions within the long period range are different from those of the far-fault ground motions. In the present study, the influence of this type of earthquake records on the fragility curves of the steel special moment resisting frames, SMRFs, was examined. The results indicated that the median value of the collapse capacity (i.e.ŜCt Parameter, which defines the earthquake intensity leading to the collapse of the structure in half-set of the chosen records) due to near-fault ground motions was 76% that of the far-fault records for the ten-story example SMRF.



Abdollahzadeh, G., Sazjini, M. and Asghari, A. (2015). “Seismic fragility assessment of Special Truss Moment Frames (STMF) using the capacity spectrum method”, Civil Engineering Infrastructures Journal, 48(1), 1-8.

Alavi, B. and Krawinkler, H. (2001). Effects of near-fault ground motions on frame structures, Stanford: John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, 301.

ATC (Applied Technology Council), (2011), Seismic performance assessment of buildings, Volume 1: Methodology, ATC-58-1 75% Draft, Redwood City, California.

Bozorgnia, Y. and Bertero, V.V. (2004). Earthquake engineering: From engineering seismology to performance-based engineering, CRC press.

FEMA. (2000a). Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings FEMA-356, Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington, D.C.

FEMA. (2000b). Recommended seismic evaluation and upgrade criteria for existing welded Steel moment-frame buildings FEMA-351, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.

FEMA. (2000c). Recommended seismic design criteria for new steel moment frame buildings FEMA-350, Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington, D.C.

FEMA. (2009). Quantification of building seismic performance factors, FEMA P-695, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.

Gerami, M. and Abdollahzadeh, D. (2015). “Vulnerability of steel moment‐resisting frames under effects of forward directivity”, The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 24(2), 97-122.

HAZUS-MH. (2011). Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology: Earthquake model, In Hazus. ®. –MH MR5, User Manual.

Ibarra, L.F., Medina, R.A., and Krawinkler, H. (2005). “Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 34(12), 1489-1511.

Ji, J., Elnashai, A.S. and Kuchma, D.A. (2007). Seismic fragility assessment for reinforced concrete high-rise buildings, MAE Center CD Release 07-14.

Kalkan, E. and Kunnath, S.K. (2006). “Effects of fling step and forward directivity on seismic response of buildings”, Earthquake Spectra, 22(2), 367-390.

Krishna, K.G. (2017). Fragility analysis, A tool to assess seismic performance of structural systems”, Materials Today: Proceedings, 4(9), 10565-10569.

Lignos, D., Chung, Y., Nagae, T. and Nakashima, M. (2011). “Numerical and experimental evaluation of seismic capacity of high-rise steel buildings subjected to long duration earthquakes”, Computers and Structures, 89(11-12), 959-967.

Marano, G.C., Greco, R. and Morrone, E. (2011). “Analytical evaluation of essential facilities fragility curves by using a stochastic approach”, Engineering Structures, 33(1), 191-201.

Özhendekci, D. and Özhendekci, N. (2012). “Seismic performance of steel special moment resisting frames with different span arrangements”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 72, 51-60.

Perrault, M. and Gueguen, P. (2015). “Correlation between ground motion and building response using California earthquake records”, Earthquake Spectra, 31(4), 2027-2046.

Pitilakis, K. (2015). Earthquake risk assessment: certitudes, fallacies, uncertainties and the quest for soundness perspectives on European earthquake engineering and seismology, Springer, Cham, 59-95.

Ruiz-García, J., Gilmore, A.T. and Zuñiga-Cuevas, O. (2010). “Simplified DRIFT-BASED fragility assessment of confined Masonary buildings”, Proceedings of the 9th U.S. National and 10th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Canada, Toronto.

Sehhati, R., Rodriguez-Marek, A., ElGawady, M. and Cofer, W.F. (2011). “Effects of near-fault ground motions and equivalent pulses on multi-story structures”, Engineering Structures, 33(3), 767-779.

Shehu, R., Angjeliu, G. and Bilgin, H. (2019). “A simple approach for the design of ductile earthquake-resisting frame structures counting for P-Delta effect”, Buildings, 9(10), 216.

Soleimani Amiri, F., Ghodrati Amiri, G. and Razeghi, H. (2013). “Estimation of seismic demands of steel frames subjected to near‐fault earthquakes having forward directivity and comparing with pushover analysis results”, The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 22(13), 975-988.

UBC. (1997). Uniform building code, Whittier, CA.

Vamvatsikos, D. and Cornell, C.A. (2004). “Applied incremental dynamic analysis”, Earthquake Spectra, 20(2), 523-553.

Zareian, F. and Krawinkler, H. (2007). “Assessment of probability of collapse and design for collapse safety”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 36(13), 1901-1914.

Zareian, F. and Medina, R.A. (2010). “A practical method for proper modeling of structural damping in inelastic plane structural systems”, Computers and Structures, 88(1-2), 45-53.