Are There Any Differences in Seismic Performance Evaluation Criteria for Concrete Arch Dams?

Document Type: Technical Notes


1 K. N. Toosi University of Technology

2 University of Colorado ar Boulder


Differences between stress-based and strain-based criteria are investigated in seismic performance evaluation of the arch dams in time domain. A numerical model of the coupled dam-reservoir-foundation system is prepared with the finite element technique. Reservoir is modeled using the Eulerian approach as a compressible domain, and the foundation rock is assumed to be massless. Dynamic equilibrium equations for the coupled system are solved using Newmark’s time integration algorithm. Seismic performance of the arch dam is evaluated according to parameters such as demand-capacity ratio, cumulative inelastic duration and overstressed (or overstrained) areas obtained from linear elastic analyses. The results show, although there are some similarities between stress-based and strain-based criteria, evaluation of the performance based on the strain gives different results which can be led to different decision making in dam safety related projects.


Bayraktar, A., Sevim, B., Altunısık A.C., Turker, T., Kartal, M.E., Akkose, M. and Bilici, Y. (2009). “Comparison of near and far fault ground motion effects on the seismic performance evaluation of dam-reservoir-foundation systems”, Dam Engineering, 19(4), 201-239.

Chen, D.H., Du, C.B., Yuan, J.W. and Hong, Y.W. (2012). “An investigation into the influence of damping on the earthquake response analysis of a high arch dam”, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 16(3), 329-349.

Fok, K.L. and Chopra, A.K. (1986). “Hydrodynamic and foundation flexibility effects in earthquake response of arch dams”, Journal of Structural Engineering, 112(8), 1810-1828.

Ghanaat, Y. (2002). “Seismic performance and damage criteria for concrete dams”, Proceedings of the 3rd US-Japan Workshop on Advanced Research on Earthquake Engineering for Dams. San Diego, California.

Ghanaat, Y. (2004). “Failure modes approach to safety evaluation of dams”, Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada.

Hall, R.L., Matheu, E.E. and Liu, T.C. (1999). “Performance evaluation of the seismic response of concrete gravity dams”, International Conference on Health Monitoring of Civil Infrastructure Systems, Chongqing, China.

Hariri-Ardebili, M.A. and Mirzabozorg, H. (2011). “investigation of endurance time method capability in seismic performance evaluation of concrete arch dams”, Dam Engineering, 22(1), 35-64.

Hariri-Ardebili, M.A. and Mirzabozorg, H. (2012). “Effects of near-fault ground motions in seismic performance evaluation of a symmetry arch dam”, Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 49(5), 192-199.

Hariri-Ardebili, M.A. and Mirzabozorg, H. (2013). “A comparative study of the seismic stability of coupled arch dam-foundation-reservoir systems using infinite elements and viscous boundary models”, International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamic, 13(6), DOI: 10.1142/S0219455413500326.

Hariri-Ardebili, M.A., Kolbadi, S.M., Heshmati, M. and Mirzabozorg, M. (2012). “Nonlinear analysis of concrete structural components using co-axial rotating smeared crack model”, Journal of Applied Science, 12(3), 21-232.

Hariri-Ardebili, M.A., Mirzabozorg, H. and Kianoush, M.R. (2013). “Seismic analysis of high arch dams considering contraction-peripheral joints coupled effects”, Central European Journal of Engineering, 3(3), 549-564.

Hariri-Ardebili, M.A., Mirzabozorg, H., Ghaemian, M., Akhavan, M. and Amini, R. (2011). “Calibration of 3D FE model of DEZ high arch dam in thermal and static conditions using instruments and site observation”, Proceeding of the 6th International Conference in Dam Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal.

Mirzabozorg, H., Akbari, M. and Hariri-Ardebili, M.A. (2012). “Wave passage and incoherency effects on seismic response of high arch dams”, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 11(4), 567-578.

Raphael, J.M. (1984). “The tensile strength of concrete”, ACI Journal Proceedings, 81, 158-165.

Studer, J.A. (2004). “Evaluation of earthquake safety of new and existing dams: Trends and experience”, Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, August, Paper No. 233.

US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), (2007). “EM 1110-2-6053: Earthquake design and evaluation of concrete hydraulic structures”, Washington, D.C.

Wieland, M. and Fan, B.H. (2004). “The activities of the international commission on large dams (ICOLD) in the earthquake safety of large dams”, Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, August, Paper No. 5051.

Wieland, M., Brenner R.P. and Sommer, P. (2003). “Earthquake resiliency of large concrete dams: Damage, repair, and strengthening concepts”, Proceedings of the 21st International Congress on Large Dams, ICOLD, Montreal, Canada.

Yamaguchi, Y., Hall, R., Sasaki, T., Matheu, E., Kanenawa, K., Chudgar, A. and Yule, D. (2004). “Seismic performance evaluation of concrete gravity dams”, Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, August, Paper No. 1068.

Zhang, C., Pan, J. and Wang, J. (2009). “Influence of Seismic Input Mechanisms and Radiation Damping on Arch Dam Response”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 29, 1282-1293.